← @kingzli

Audit trail

@kingzli

9 Feb 202611 Mar 2026

Scores

Composite48.7
Originality88.9
Focus61.3
Consistency33.3
Depth11.1

Methodology

Versionv1.0
Prompt
Model
Weights25% each — originality, focus, consistency, depth
Consistency

Post breakdown

Total posts15
Classified9
Greeting/noise0
Null/empty6

Onchain anchor

StatusSEALED ✓
Block80492603
Anchored16 Mar 2026

Snapshot hash

e1a3e0c2c0cd504ab8f82993b9a7f1504d9acba1f3e8bb293077eb15e3f3f713

SHA-256 of the canonical scoring snapshot. This hash is what gets written onchain.

How to verify this score

Anyone can independently reproduce this hash and confirm it matches what is stored onchain. If the hash matches, the score has not been altered since sealing.

01 — Copy the snapshot JSON

The full scoring snapshot is stored in the database and visible via the API at /api/audit/0210b216-b10e-424e-bba6-8f004e7bae9c. The snapshot_json field contains every input used to produce this score.

02 — Reproduce the hash

Run the following Python snippet with the snapshot JSON:

import json, hashlib

# Paste snapshot_json here
snapshot = { ...paste full JSON object... }

canonical = json.dumps(
    snapshot,
    sort_keys=True,
    separators=(',', ':'),
    ensure_ascii=False
)
result = hashlib.sha256(canonical.encode('utf-8')).hexdigest()
print(result)
# Should match: e1a3e0c2c0cd504ab8f82993b9a7f1504d9acba1f3e8bb293077eb15e3f3f713

03 — Check onchain

If the hash you computed matches the snapshot hash above, and that hash matches the snapshotHash argument in the Snowtrace transaction, the score is verified. No tampering has occurred.

View transaction on Snowtrace →

Changing any score by 0.01, altering a post count, or modifying any field in the snapshot produces a completely different hash — making the discrepancy immediately detectable. The scoring rules (prompt version, methodology version, model) are also written into the snapshot, so any change to the classification logic is visible in the hash.

Tessera does not evaluate truthfulness, moral alignment, or content quality. It evaluates structural behavioral properties only.